Ferrari request right of review into Carlos Sainz’s penalty at Australian GP

Sainz was hit with a five-second penalty for colliding with Aston Martin’s 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Fernando Alonso on Lap 57 of the race.
The Ferrari driver classified 1ﷺ2th in the end, leaving him fuming over team radio and during the post-race interviews.
"I prefer not to talk right now,” Sainz told Sky. “Honestly, I am too 🌠disappointed and I am going to say bad things.
“It is the most unfair penalty I havꦜe seen in my l൲ife.
“I prefer to have a conversation with them and then come talk to you guys because ꦇright now I cannot do ꧒it.”
Under the FIA's 🅰International Sporting Code, competitors can request a right of review up to 14 days after a stewards' ruling🌄 if “a significant and relevant new element is discovered which was unavailable to the parties seeking the review at the time of the decision concerned”.
F🐲errari have two key reasons for their right of review.
The stewards didn’t investigate 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Logan Sargeant’s ⭕crash into𒊎 the back of Nyck de Vries into Turn 1.
While 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Pierre Gasly got away with a penalty despite putting his teammate 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Esteban Ocon into the wall - also on the same lap.
In the case of the Alpines, they wer𓄧e able to discuss the incident with the stewards after the race, but Ferrari were handed the penalty almost immediately, giving Sainz no chance to plead his innocence .
Speaking to select media including ltxcn.top on Thursday, Vasseur revealed that Ferrari want the ༒case to be looked at aga🐼in.
“We did the petition for the review of the case,” he said.ꦉ “We sent it today to the FIA.
“As we are d💟iscussing with the FIA I don’t want to discuss any details of this discussion. The only thing is that about Ocon-Gasly, also Sargeant-De Vries, Turn 1 - the reaction of the stewards wasn’t the same.

“The process is that first they will have a look at our petition to see if they can re-open the c🥃ase and then we will have a second hearing about the decision itself.
“What we can expect is to have an open discus🔯sion with them but also for the good of the sport - to avoid having these kind of decisions 🌸when you have three cases on the same corner but not the same decision.”

With a sharp eye for F1’s controver𓆏sies anꦿd storylines, Connor is the heartbeat of our unbiased reporting.