F1𝔉’s governing body - the FIA - have issued a statement responding to allegations surrounding president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, revealing that a report does exist.

The reported earlier this week that Ben Sulayem had allegedly 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:interfered with the race result of the 2023 Saudi Arabian Grand Prix after 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Fernando Alonso had been hit with a 10-second time penalty.

Ben Sulayem 🀅allegedly intervened to try and get Alonso’s penalty 💙overturned to ensure the Aston Martin driver remained on the podium.

24 hours later, a sec🌠ond set of allegations emerged, this time around the Las Vegas Grand Priಌx.

The same whistleblower who made the claim about Ben Sulayem’s involvement in the Saudi Arabia result said that the FIA✅ president allegedly instructed officials not to certify the new Las Vegas GP circuit.

By not certifying it, it would mean that the FIA deemed itဣ not safe to race on and F1’s glamorous event in Ameriꦿca wouldn’t have been able to go ahead.

On Tuesday evening, the FIA issued the ▨following statement, confirming that a report “detailing potential allegations🌸” does exist.

“FIA confirms that the Compliance Officer has received a report detailing potential allegations involving certain members of its governing bodies,” i🔥t read.

“The Compliance Department is assessing these concerns, as is common practice in th🐎ꦦese matters, to ensure that due process is meticulously followed.”

Alonso's penalty was ultimately remove༺d after Aston Martin's right of review was accepted.

The Spaniard was awarded a penalty 🎀after it was deemed that the mechanics were working on his car while serving his five-second time - which is against the rules.

But it was overturned, with the stewards noting: “There was no clear agreement, as was suggested to the Stewards previously, that could be relied upon to determine that parties had agreed that a jack touching a car would amount to working on the car. In the circumstances, we considered that our original decision to impose a penalty on Car 14 needed to be reversed a🌳nd we did so accordingly.”

What does the report say? 

The BBC have seen the aforementioned report and noted the following claims from it, with𝄹 regards to t🦂he Las Vegas GP.

The report notes: “[The manager}, who on behest of the FIA pr🍨esident instructed him to find some conc🌠erns to prevent the FIA from certifying the circuit before the weekend of the race".

It adds: "The purpose was to find fault with the track in order to withhold the licence" an🎶d "asked to be more specific, [the whistleblower] said that issues on the circuit were meant to be artificially identified regardless of their actual existence, with the ultimate goal of withholding the licence."

The Las Vegas GP went ahead as scheduled, alth⛄ough the first day of running was curt🌳ailed by a loose drain hole cover.