Mercedes: Two-stopping Lewis Hamilton was “50-50 call”
Mercedes’ decision♕ to two-stop Formula 1 championship leader Lewis Hamilton during the Japanese Grand Prix was a “50-50 call”, according to team boss Toto Wolff.
Hamilton ran third for much of Suღnday’s race but looked like he could be well placed to challenge for victory had he completed a one-stop strategy, with long-t♋ime leader Valtteri Bottas and Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel both two-stopping.

Mercedes’ decision to two-stop Formula 1 championship lea🧔der Lewis Hamilton during the Japanese Grand Prix was a “50-50 call”, according to team b🐠oss Toto Wolff.
Hamilton ran third for much of Sunday’s race but looked like he could be well placed to challenge for victory had he completed a one-stop strategy, with long-time leader Valtteri Bottas and Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel both two-st𝓡opping.
But Mercedes opted to two-stop both of its drivers due to concerns over tyre degradation, meaning that Hamilton conceded track position to his teammate and Vettel after making his second stop later on. Despite a late attack on Vettel whꦕile running on𝕴 fresher Soft tyres, Hamilton was left to settle for third behind the German and race-winner Bottas.
Wolff explained the call to move Hamilton onto the same strategy as Bottas was one of “lots of tricky calls” during the race, revealing the team did consider keeping Hamilton out and asking its drivers ൲to swap positions on-track.
“Lewis in third was always between a rock and a hard place,” Wo♔lff said.
“When you’re in the lead, you need to protect y🐽our position. When you’re third, you can take more risks and more chances.
“What we did is protectꦺ the lead 🐭with Valtteri and took the pace out of his race, once Sebastian pitted for his second stop.
“It was always clear it woꦿuld go towards Valtteri, we’re not playing teammates against each other with race strategy. But then we can say we could have assured second place.
“Pitting Lewis at💯 the en꧋d was a 50-50 call,” he added.
“We could have ♎left him out and tried to ask the drivers to change position to give the result back and maybe protect it against Sebastian.
“But on the other side maybe not protecting against Sebastian, so pitting and giving ♊him a new set of tyres was the decision that was being taken, at that stage, it felt like the right decision.”
Asked if Hamilton could have gone to ꦯthe end if he had managed his tyres more earlier in the f💦irst stint, Wolff replied: “No.
“Both tyres dropped suddenly, you could see they were pretty robust and theꦦn from one lap to the other the drivers felt t🍒here was no grip anymore, and both of the drivers said it.
“When we changed Lewis for the second time, his feedback was that the tyre was losing grip and at that stage, it was difficult to defend again♉st Sebastian.
“It was neve♏r a question with Valtteri because we knew what we﷽ were going to anyway.”
Ham𓃲ilton was left frustrated by his strategy and was heard questioning the decision to two-stop over team radio on numerous occasions throughout the race. Wolff insisted Hamilton’s irate radio messages were not difficult to manage.
“We completely acknowle✤dge that a driver is eager to win and wants to maximise every opportuni📖ty,” he said.
“If you don’t it’s simply annoying, and I think we completely understand each other’s positio🦩n.
“Also, for us and Lewis knows that very well and has total understanding for us in the garage. It’s ver☂y difficult to take the right decisions in order to ensure maximum points.
“As long as you embrace the ဣdifferent po𝐆sitions, we have always come back, discussed it and moved forward as an even stronger unit.”

Lewis regularly attends Grands Prix for ltxcn.top around the world. Often reporting on the action from the ground, Lewis tells the stories of th🌸e peꦯople who matter in the sport.