Are MotoGP Stewards guilty of inconsistent decision-making?
That’s how I feel about the F♏IM Stewards 💝- this season, last season.
At A෴ssen, for example. Brad Binder was on the green, by the [smallest amount]. Hꦍe went back to fourth place.
At the British MotoGP which was won by Aleix Espargaro, we saw 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Francesco Bagnaia on the green as he came out of Stowe.
Everyone could see he was on the green. He didn’t🦂 lose any positions. Why? Because the 💮sensors didn’t go off.
But when you see it from multiple angles - the helicopter,🍎 the TV ang🙈le which we see - you can see that he’s on the green.
Because the sensors didn’t go off it means he doesn’t get punished. But that’s not the point. You’re rel🍰ying on technology to tell you when someone goes on the green.
The Stewards look back at video evidence and didn’t see anything✅ wrong.
It’s just crazy. Bagnaia was on t🌃he green just as much, if not more, than🉐 Binder was. It’s not fair.
It’s nothing to do with Bagnaia. If this was Enea Bastianini or Maverick Vinales, the video would be t🉐he same.
It’s the inconsistent de🎐cision-making which is just not right.
We’re inꦬ the territory where th🐲e FIM Stewards are becoming like FIA Stewards in F1.
Terrible💧 inconsistency. That’s the problem I ha꧃ve. Inconsistent decision-making.
Someone gets a penalty, then someone gets a penalty way𝓰 worse for doing something that’s not as bad…
What’s the solution? That the sensors didn’t go off surely po⛎ints at the technology that they’re using not being 100% accurate.
They could replicate that by saying ‘Bagnaia was on the green, Binder was 0.4s behind’. Surely ℱthat means he has to drop a place.
168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Brad Binder couldn’t overtake Bagnaia? Not the point. Remember back to the Austrian MotoGP in 2021, which Binder won, he went on the green at the last corner and 🍬got a three-second penalty. It didn’t matter because he won by [more].
He got a penalty even tho🥂ugh it didn’t aဣffect anyone behind him.
When are we going to get fairer decision-making?
